Also, why was the story one-sided? Did you not see the industry spokesman, Paul Elvig, who was given a chance to defend his business? Did you not see that SCI refused to talk to 60 Minutes? What, pray tell, would you have them do? Sometimes one side is wrong. Period. If you’re used to mainstream journalism and its false “balance”, whereby everyone’s words are deemed to be equally truthful, then I suppose you might be shocked when a news program actually points out that one party is behaving very badly indeed.